What about introducing a design initiative that lacks background knowledge and probably is not possible? Look at it from a different angle: the "why" of it is well founded: there is full general agreement that deforestation should be halted, better reversed. But the "how" is wishful thinking, better use the word: "perhaps".

This it what I did with the new design initiative
'Solar Cooking and Baking'.
There is an illustration of how it could look, there is a list of assumptions behind this design, there will be a long list of urgent questions that just illustrate how flimsy the "how" is backed up.
Yet I feel this is the way to do it, this is how it should be done more often. Presenting in reasonable detail a total picture should arouse detailed support. People should address us with bits of conflicting or supportive information. No one will do it without such an incentive. A few will do it no doubt with ideas and data that suddenly will give a boost to this Open Source challenge.
I personally know nothing about heat pipes or molten salt. But thousands of people do. One day I'll get the missing news from one of them.
What's new: Innovating while knowing next to nothing
< Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | Next >